For papers that replicate previous works and articles, the Quarterly Journal of
Finance and Accounting (QJFA) provides a unique forum for replicative works and
articles that synthesize the literature in business, economics, and social sciences,
especially topics that bridge several disciplines. The QJFA editorial board strives
to publish high caliber papers in finance, economics, accounting, marketing, management,
and related fields. Seminal works by
Edward J. Kane (QJBE, 1984) and
Robert A. Mittelstaedt and Thomas S. Zorn (QJBE, 1984) establish the
role and importance of replication within the experimental tradition of the academy.
The Quarterly Journal of Finance and Accounting as an editorial policy, will place
priority on the following kinds of articles:
- Studies that reexamine important empirical works, using either a different set of
data or an alternative empirical or theoretical framework. Such replications should
emphasize extension of the original results or determination of their generality
and should not merely repeat the work.
- Studies that test important theoretical works and shed additional light on the issue.
- Surveys that review and evaluate critically the literature. These articles should
examine a theoretical, methodological, empirical, or policy issue from the perspective
of a particular field or from the viewpoint of several fields.
There are several mechanical questions of interest to QJFA authors. Extreme dependence
(such as an author replicating his own work or a student replicating the work of
a professor) destroys the econometric audit function to which Kane alludes. The
policy of this journal will be to reject such replications. Less extreme dependence
(such as replication using data or computer programs supplied by the original author)
will be judged by the referees and the editors on a case-by-case basis. Clearly,
it is the independence of the two works that makes replication valuable.
The importance of the paper being replicated, the number of previous published replications,
and the quality of the replication will affect the acceptance/rejection and space
allocation decisions. In general (using the Mittelstaedt/Zorn typology), Type I
replications can be presented more succinctly than Types II and III. These, in turn,
should require less space that Type IV replications.
The Quarterly Journal of Finance and Accounting is published by the College of Business
Administration of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln as a service to scholars of
business and economics.
The views and opinions expressed are those of the individual authors and do not
represent those of UNL, the College of Business Administration, or individual staff
members.
Each paper is reviewed by a member of the editorial board and usually two referees
selected from leading scholars in the U.S. and Canada.
Editorial Philosophy
The Quarterly Journal of Finance and Accounting provides a unique forum for new
and replicative works and articles that synthesize the literature in finance and
accounting, especially topics that bridge the disciplines.
The QJFA editorial board strives to publish high caliber papers in finance, economics,
accounting, and related fields. Seminal papers by
Edward J. Kane (QJBE, 1984) and
Robert A. Mittelstaedt and Thomas S. Zorn (QJBE, 1984) provide the theoretical
underpinnings for the QJFA's editorial philosophy
The Quarterly Journal of Finance and Accounting has published diverse authors such
as John Maynard Keynes, Paul A. Volcker, Murray Weidenbaum, Hyman Minsky, Juanita
Kreps, Robert Solow, and Paul McCracken.
Margo Young
Managing Editor
University of Nebraska - Lincoln
College of Business Administration
P.O. Box 880407
Lincoln, NE 68588-0407
(402) 472-7931
myoung1@unl.edu